State v. Sutton, 302 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · Go Syfert
State v. Sutton, 302 S.W.3d 743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
v.
Cornelius A. SUTTON
No. ED 92297.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jan 26, 2010.
Published opinion
302 S.W.3d 743
2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 61
2010 WL 289111
Terrence M. Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent., Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Cen-tre, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Ahrens, Baker, Crane.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Cornelius A. Sutton, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.024 RSMo (2000); robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000); and burglary in the first degree, in violation"’ of "section’ 569.160 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on the involuntary manslaughter count; life imprisonment on the robbery count; and thirty years imprisonment on the burglary count, to be served consecutively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).