Soderquist v. Fremont Cnty., Idaho, 883 F.2d 1024 (9th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Soderquist v. Fremont Cnty., Idaho, 883 F.2d 1024 (9th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Intelligrated Systems, LLC v. Hy-Tek Material Handling Installation Services (ohsd, 2022-05-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Intelligrated Systems, LLC v. Hy-Tek Material Handling Installation Services
S.D. Ohio · 2022 · confidence medium
Ohio 2013); E.E.O.C. v. Univ. of Penn., 850 F.2d 969, 971 (3d Cir. 1988); Knedlik v. Lincoln Inst. of Land Pol’y, 883 F.2d 1024, at *3 (9th Cir. 1989); Agri-Process Innovations, Inc. v. Greenline Indus., LLC, No. 4:08CV00558BSM, 2008 WL 4126909 , at *3 (E.D.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Grady v. Commonwealth (2×)
Ky. · 2010 · confidence medium
Importantly, however, courts employing the Procunier standard of appellate review have also stated that the facts asserted in these instances must be more than “eonclusory and wholly devoid of specifics.” Hoskins v. Vasquez, 883 F.2d 1024, 1024 (9th Cir. 1989) (citing Boehme v. Maxwell, 423 F.2d 1056, 1058 (9th Cir.1970); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1233 (9th Cir.1984)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Soderquist
v.
Fremont County, Idaho
36-3_19.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 11, 1989.
883 F.2d 1024
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Unpublished

883 F.2d 1024

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Lyle R. SODERQUIST, Krista Soderquist, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FREMONT COUNTY, IDAHO, Terry Thompson, Bert C. Bates, Kurt
Hillman, Brian Loske, Keith Saurey, Kim Saurey,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3509.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 3, 1989.
Decided Aug. 11, 1989.

Marion J. Callister, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOELSCH, ALARCON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM[*]

2

Having thoroughly and carefully reviewed this matter, we adopt as the opinion of this court the Memorandum Opinion of the United States District Court of the District of Idaho dated October 8, 1987 and December 16, 1987.

3

So ordered.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3