Cited for
At page 229 cited at this page1 citing case
- State ex rel. KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 408 S.W.3d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).publishedW.D.2012), we will decide an issue presented on appeal, even if it is moot, “when it is demonstrated that the case in question presents an issue that (1) is of general public interest; (2) will recur; and (3) will evade appellate review in…
At page 231 cited at this page1 citing case
- State Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Missouri Gas Energy, 395 S.W.3d 540 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).publishedId. at 231.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Interest of S.C., M.C., R.C., A.S., C.S., D.M.C. (Mother)
v.
Juvenile Officer
v.
Juvenile Officer
No. WD 74665.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Oct 9, 2012.
Published opinion
Pamela S. DeForest, Kansas City, MO, for respondent Juvenile Officer., M. Shemane Mann, Kansas City, MO, Respondent Guardian Ad Litem., Jo Leigh Fischer and Dione C. Greene, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Hardwick, Smart, Witt.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM:D.M.C. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding it had jurisdiction under RSMo 211.031.1 and removing from Mother’s custody her five minor children. In her one point on appeal, Mother argues that the juvenile officer did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Mother exhibited a pattern of neglect towards her children nor did the officer prove that Mother failed to protect her children from sexual abuse. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).