Sandford v. Providence Bank, 412 S.W.3d 270 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Sandford v. Providence Bank, 412 S.W.3d 270 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2015–2022 · …after j.c.w. ex rel. webb, moving to set aside a default judgment for failure to state a claim does not raise an issue of the circuit court's subject matter jurisdiction at p. 277 ⚠ not in text
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Patricia Robertson v. Charles Rosner (moctapp, 2022-02-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Patricia Robertson v. Charles Rosner (2×) also: Cited "see"
Mo. Ct. App. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
after j.c.w. ex rel. webb, moving to set aside a default judgment for failure to state a claim does not raise an issue of the circuit court's subject matter jurisdiction
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) U.S. BANK, N.A., f/k/a BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and ARVEST BANK, Plaintiffs/Lienholders-Respondents v. DOUGLAS L. COVERDELL, and COVERDELL ENTERPRISES, INC., and COMMUNITY BANK OF THE OZARKS, INC., and HCW DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, HCW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and HCW NORTH, LLC, Defendants-Respondents, and CITY OF BRANSON, MISSOURI, and THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY, Intervenors-Respondents
Mo. Ct. App. · 2015 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
after j.c.w. ex rel. webb, moving to set aside a default judgment for failure to state a claim does not raise an issue of the circuit court's subject matter jurisdiction
cited Cited as authority (rule) U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Coverdell
Mo. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. A.D.D. v. PLB Enters., Inc., 412 S.W.3d 270, 277 (Mo.App.W.D.2013) ("after J.C.W. ex rel.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Erica Hollins v. Capital Solutions Investments I, Inc., d/b/a Loan Express Co. (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
A.D.D. v. PLE Enterprises, Inc., 412 S.W.3d 270, 276-77 (Mo.App.W.D.2013); see also Christianson v. Goucher, 414 S.W.3d 584, 591 (Mo.App.W.D.2013)(noting its recent opinion in A.D.D. when rejecting the argument that the failure to state a claim raises an issue of subject matter jurisdiction).
cited Cited "see" Bramer v. Abston
Mo. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See A.D.D. v. PLE Enterprises, Inc. , 412 S.W.3d 270 , 280 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013) ; see also In re the Formation of the Neosho Transp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graves M. SANDFORD
v.
PROVIDENCE BANK
No. WD 75593.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Apr 30, 2013.
412 S.W.3d 270
Daniel H. Miller, Columbia, MO, for appellant., Jonathan C. Browning, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Ellis, Hardwick, Martin.
Published

Order

PER CURIAM.

Graves Sandford and Zandra Sandford appeal the circuit court’s judgment dismissing their petition for damages against Providence Bank. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the dismissal.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).