Special Indem. Fund v. Reynolds, 188 P.2d 841 (Okla. 1948). · Go Syfert
Search
Special Indem. Fund v. Reynolds, 188 P.2d 841 (Okla. 1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
157 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gentges v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 2014 OK 8, 319 P.3d 674
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950 1988 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
188 P.2d at 842 cited at this page20 citing cases
  • Rowland v. City of Tulsa, 1999 OK 75, 988 P.2d 1282. 2 cites
    Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948). [18] Morrison, supra note 12 at 270 syl. 1. [19] Id. [20] For the pertinent terms of 85 O.S.Supp.1994 § 3.6, see supra note 3. [21] The pertinent terms of Art. 7 § 6, Okl.
  • MacY v. Oklahoma City Sch. Dist. No. 89, 1998 OK 58, 961 P.2d 804. 2 cites
    No. 52 of Oklahoma County, 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 , 54 n. 10; McCracken v. City of Lawton, 1982 OK 63 , 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11; Application of Goodwin, 1979 OK 106 , 597 P.2d 762, 764 ; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 ,…
  • PFL Life Ins. Co. v. Franklin, 1998 OK 32, 958 P.2d 156.
    Reynolds v. Special Indemnity Fund, 1986 OK 64 , 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 ; National Gypsum Co. v. Brewster, 1969 OK 185 , 461 P.2d 593, 596 ; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948). 22 .
  • Russell v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 1997 OK 80, 952 P.2d 492. 2 cites
    No. 52 of Oklahoma County, 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 , 54 n. 10; McCracken v. City of Lawton, 1982 OK 63 , 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11; Application of Goodwin, 1979 OK 106 , 597 P.2d 762, 764 ; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 ,…
  • Red Rock Mental Health v. Roberts, 940 P.2d 486 (Okla. 1997).
    Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948); National Gypsum Co. v. Brewster, Okl., 461 P.2d 593, 596 (1969); Reynolds v. Special Indemn.
  • Little v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation, 1997 OK 57, 938 P.2d 739.
    Fund, Old., 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 (1986); Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Old. 570, 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948). 6 .
  • Park View Hosp. Trust Auth. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Dep't of Labor, 925 P.2d 541 (Okla. 1996). 2 cites
    Corp. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 (1986); Lawrence, supra note 8 at 315-316; Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 (1979); Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948); Peppers…
  • Jackson v. Oklahoma Mem'l Hosp., 909 P.2d 765 (Okla. 1995).
    Fund, Okl., 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 (1986); Davis v. Davis, Okl., 708 P.2d 1102 , 1104 n. 2 (1985); Burdick v. Independent School Dist., Okl., 702 P.2d 48 , 54 n. 10 (1985); McCracken v. City of Lawton, Okl., 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11 (1982); App…
  • Benning v. Pennwell Publ'g Co., 885 P.2d 652 (Okla. 1994).
    Reynolds, Okl., 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948). 21 .
  • North Side State Bank v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 894 P.2d 1046 (Okla. 1994).
    Fund, Okl., 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 (1986); Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 (1979); Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948).
Show 10 more citing cases
  • Hough v. Leonard, 867 P.2d 438 (Okla. 1993). 2 cites
    Fund, Okl., 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 (1986); Burdick v. Independent School Dist., Okl., 702 P.2d 48, 54 (1985); McCracken v. City of Lawton, Okl., 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11 (1982); Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 (1979); Special In…
  • Simpson v. Dixon, 853 P.2d 176 (Okla. 1993).
    Fund, Okl., 725 P.2d 1265, 1270 (1986); Burdick v. Independent School Dist., Okl., 702 P.2d 48, 54 (1985); McCracken v. City of Lawton, Okl., 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11 (1982); Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 (1979); Special In…
  • Smith v. State Ex Rel. Bd. of Regents of Oklahoma State Univ., 846 P.2d 370 (Okla. 1993). 2 cites
    Northeast Okl., Elec. v. Corporation Com'n, Okl., 808 P.2d 680, 683 (1991); Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 719 (1986); Lawrence, supra note 6 at 315; Goodwin, supra note 15 at 764; Special Indemnity Fund v…
  • First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. Nath, 839 P.2d 1336 (Okla. 1992).
    See Burdick v. Independent School Dist., Okl., 702 P.2d 48, 54 (1985); McCracken v. City of Lawton, Okl., 648 P.2d 18 , 21 n. 11 (1982); Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948). 36 .
  • State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Smolen, 837 P.2d 894 (Okla. 1992). 2 cites
    PATTERSON, JURISPRUDENCE § 4.62, at 533 (1953). [6] Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948).
  • Davis v. BF Goodrich, 826 P.2d 587 (Okla. 1992). 2 cites
    Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 (1948).
  • City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 789 P.2d 1287 (Okla. 1990). 2 cites
    Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 [1986]; Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., supra note 5 at 315-316; Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 [1979]; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds,…
  • Tulsa Tribune Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 768 P.2d 891 (Okla. 1989). 2 cites
    Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 [1986]; Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., supra note 1 at 316; Application of Goodwin, Okl., 597 P.2d 762, 764 [1979]; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199…
  • Reynolds v. Special Indem. Fund, 725 P.2d 1265 (Okla. 1986).
    No. 52 of Oklahoma City, Okl., 702 P.2d 48, 54 [1985] and Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 [1948].
  • Lekan v. P & L Fire Prot. Co., 609 P.2d 1289 (Okla. 1980).
    Special Indemnity Fund v. Bramlett, 201 Okl. 415 , 206 P.2d 972, 974 [1949]; Special Indemnity Fund v. Acuff, Okl., 383 P.2d 630, 633 [1963]; Special Indemnity Fund v. Reynolds, 199 Okl. 570 , 188 P.2d 841, 842 [1948]. 9 .
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SPECIAL INDEMNITY FUND
v.
REYNOLDS
No. 32988.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Jan 13, 1948.
188 P.2d 841
1948 Okla. LEXIS 440
Mont R. Powell and Don Anderson, both of Oklahoma City, for petitioner., Hatcher & Hatcher, of Oklahoma City, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.
Arnold, Corn, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Luttrell, Riley, Welch.
Cited by 73 opinions  |  Published
DAVISON, V.C.J.

This is an original action in this court brought by the Special Indemnity Fund to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of Walter E. Reynolds by virtue of his being a “physically impaired person” within the provisions of 85 O. S. Supp. 1943, §§171 and 172. The parties will be referred to as claimant, respondent, and the Fund, as they appeared before the commission. The employer has paid the award against it for the last injury and is not a party to this appeal.

On August 1, 1945, while in the employ of the respondent, Oklahoma Bed Springs Company, and while engaged in a hazardous employment, the claimant received an accidental personal injury, arising out of and in the course of his employment, resulting in a loss of use of and. permanent disability to his left arm. This was determined by the commission to be 10% and an award against the respondent was made therefor.

Previously, in 1939, claimant had been so injured that his left eye was removed. Prior to that, and in 1930, he had injured his back to the extent that he had a 20%' permanent total disability to his body as a whole.

Although the effective date of the 1945 amendment to the above section of the statute was April 28, 1945, some three months before the claimant was injured, the case was tried by the parties, decided by the commission, and is here presented upon the theory that the 1943 act was controlling. The record and briefs are therefore not sufficiently complete that this court can make a final disposition of the cause without further proceedings before the commission. Cases recently decided by this court have outlined the proper method of proceeding before the commission, and extent of proof required to warrant an award against the Fund. It is not necessary to here repeat them.

The general rule of law adopted by practically all courts is that a case will not be reviewed on a theory different from that on which it was tried below, but there are exceptions thereto where “practical injustice that might result” because “the parties proceeded on a mutual mistake of law.” Murdock v. Ward, 178 U. S. 139, 44 L. Ed. 1009.

In the case of First Nat. Bank of Alex et al. v. Southland Production Co. et al., 189 Okla. 9, 112 P. 2d 1087, this court said:

[*571] “ . . . Thus where questions of public policy or widespread public interest are involved an appellate court may review a cause on a theory not presented in the trial tribunal. Magnolia Pet. Co. v. State, 175 Okla. 11, 52 P. 2d 81; Shaffer Oil & Ref. Co. v. County Treasurer of Creek County, 175 Okla. 6, 52 P. 2d 76. See, also, 3 Am. Jur. 35. . . .”

Public interest and welfare is certainly involved in the application of the Workmen’s Compensation Act which results in a payment of an award against the Special Indemnity Fund.

The award is vacated in so far as the Special Indemnity Fund is concerned, with instructions that further proceedings be had in harmony with and under the provisions of 85 O. S. Supp. 1945, §§171 and 172.

HURST, C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, ARNOLD, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.