In re L.D. v. Dailey, 498 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
In re L.D. v. Dailey, 498 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: DENNIS R. RYNO v. KEVIN S. HILLMAN (moctapp, 2022-01-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." DENNIS R. RYNO v. KEVIN S. HILLMAN
Mo. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Our conclusion that section 610.120 does not authorize a private cause of action for damages is further buttressed by section 610.115, RSMo 2000, which provides that “[a] person who knowingly violates any provision of section 610.100, 610.105, 610.106, or 610.120 is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.” A “statute which creates a criminal offense and provides a penalty for its violation, will not be construed as creating a new civil cause of action independently of the common law, unless such appears by express terms or by clear implication to have been the legislative intent.” Christy v. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the MATTER OF L.D., By Her Next Friend Lacey Waterman, and Lacey Waterman, Individually
v.
John DAILEY
WD 78957.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Sep 6, 2016.
498 S.W.3d 846
2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 888
2016 WL 4607442
Lauri J, Laughland, Grandview, MO, for appellants., John Dailey, Respondent Pro Se.
Martin, Mitchell, Witt.
Published

ORDER

Per curiam:

. Appellant Lacey Waterman (“Mother”) appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri awarding joint legal custody of the parties’ daughter, L.D., to Mother and John Dailey (“Father”). We affirm. A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b). ■. .