No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel L. Siegler
v.
Laurence S. Muller and Mitchell S. Lurio, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller & Lurio
v.
Laurence S. Muller and Mitchell S. Lurio, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller & Lurio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 15, 1931.
Published opinion
233 A.D. 852
Published
The decision of this court handed down on May 8, 1931, is hereby amended to read as follows: Order of the County Court of Kings county, in so far as it granted judgment in favor of plaintiff, reversed upon the law and the facts, and motion to that extent denied, without costs. In so far as it struck out affirmative defenses the order is affirmed, without costs. The denials in the answer present issues of fact to be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.