Toal v. Int'l Ry. Co., 243 A.D. 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935). · Go Syfert
Toal v. Int'l Ry. Co., 243 A.D. 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Mary Toal, as Administratrix, etc., of Patrick A. Toal
v.
International Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 15, 1935.
Published opinion
243 A.D. 678
Published

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that defendant’s negligence and contributory negligence in the decedent were fair questions of fact; and especially on the ground that the jury would have been entitled to find that defendant was guilty of causative negligence in having violated section 178-a of the Railroad Law. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.)