Knowlton v. Gerken, 250 A.D. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937). · Go Syfert
Knowlton v. Gerken, 250 A.D. 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel E. Knowlton
v.
Howard S. Gerken
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 10, 1937.
Published opinion
250 A.D. 819
1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116
Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that improper conduct on the part of the presentation of the defense prejudiced the rights of the plaintiff. (The resettled judgment is for defendant in an action upon a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.