Mangione v. Gen. Ry. Signal Co., 250 A.D. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937). · Go Syfert
Mangione v. Gen. Ry. Signal Co., 250 A.D. 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michele Mangione
v.
General Railway Signal Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 17, 1937.
Published opinion
250 A.D. 828
1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9174
Published

On reargument, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Chippona v. General Railway Signal Co., 249 App. Div. 255.) All concur. (The order grants plaintiff discovery and inspection of defendant’s plant in an action for personal injuries sustained by contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [See 248 App. Div. 847; 249 id. 921.]