Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush, 259 A.D. 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940). · Go Syfert
Erhardt v. Stacy-Bush, 259 A.D. 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Minnie M. Erhardt
v.
Vivian M. Stacy-Bush and George W. Stacy-Bush
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 29, 1940.
Published opinion
259 A.D. 984
1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7540
Published

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defenses of usury and of offset and of non-ownership of the note in suit are available to the defendants without the bringing in of the proposed party defendant and the order appealed from should not have been granted. (Hayes National Bank v. Chynoweth, 235 App. Div. 890; Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 2.) All concur. (The order allows defendants to bring in an additional party defendant in an action on a note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.