No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Village of Buchanan
v.
Town of Cortlandt, and Ellsworth E. Johnson, Supervisor, and Fred H. Bremner and Others, Councilmen, Comprising the Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County, New York, and as Such Acting as the Commissioners of the Verplanck Lighting District in Said Town, and Others
v.
Town of Cortlandt, and Ellsworth E. Johnson, Supervisor, and Fred H. Bremner and Others, Councilmen, Comprising the Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County, New York, and as Such Acting as the Commissioners of the Verplanck Lighting District in Said Town, and Others
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 9, 1942.
Published opinion
Published
Submission of a controversy on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff in the sum of $1,985.86, with interest thereon from the 1st day of January, 1941, without costs. We are of opinion that neither the village nor the territory annexed was responsible for the indebtedness incurred in behalf of the lighting district after December 13, 1934, the date when[*1004] the first contract, by its terms, expired; Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.