Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. The United States, 923 F.2d 838 (Fed. Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. The United States, 923 F.2d 838 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “Sea-Land”
20 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Great American Ins. Co. of Ny (cit, 2011-08-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Great American Ins. Co. of Ny
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
sea-land
discussed Cited "see" CME Acquisitions, LLC v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matra Americas, LLC v. United States, 48 CIT __ , __, 681 F. Supp. 3d 1339, 1365 (2024) (quoting Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT 253 , 257, 735 F. Supp. 1059 , 1063, aff’d and adopted per curiam, 923 F.2d 838 (mem.) (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Atar, S.r.L. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT 253 , 257, 735 F. Supp. 1059 , 1063 (1990) (“[C]ourts will not set aside agency action for procedural errors unless the errors ‘were prejudicial to the party seeking to have the action declared invalid.’”) (citation omitted), aff’d, 923 F.2d 838 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Wuhan Bee Healthy Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT 253 , 257, 735 F. Supp. 1059 , 1063 (1990) (requiring a showing that procedural errors by the agency “ ‘were prejudicial to the party seeking to have the action declared invalid’ ”) (citations omitted), aff’d and adopted, 923 F.2d 838 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see" Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT 253 , 257, 735 F.Supp. 1059 , 1063 (1990)("[I]t is ... well settled that courts will not set aside agency action for procedural errors unless the errors 'were prejudicial to the party seeking to have the action declared invalid."'), aff'd, 923 F.2d 838 (Fcd.Cir.1991). 29 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
90-1361.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 29, 1991.
923 F.2d 838
Gerald A. Malia, Ragan & Mason, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were John E. Vargo and Michael F. DiCroce. Also on the brief was Robert S. Zuckerman, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Sea-Land Services, Inc.) Iselin, N.J., of counsel., Barbara M. Epstein, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, International Trade Field Office.
Rich, Mayer, Rader.
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (1)
PER CURIAM.

Sea-Land Service, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade granting the United States’ motion to sever and dismiss 73 of Sea-Land’s entries. The court held that Sea-Land did not timely commence suit challenging the United States Customs Service’s denial of its protests over the amount of duty assessed on the entries. See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 735 F.Supp. 1059 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1990). We affirm on the basis of the court’s opinion, which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.