green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- United States v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of Ny, 791 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011).published
- Atar, S.r.L. v. United States, 2011 CIT 87 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2011).published
- Wuhan Bee Healthy Co. v. United States, 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1182 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).published
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United States, 6 F. Supp. 2d 865 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1998).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
v.
the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
90-1361.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 29, 1991.
Published opinion
Gerald A. Malia, Ragan & Mason, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were John E. Vargo and Michael F. DiCroce. Also on the brief was Robert S. Zuckerman, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Sea-Land Services, Inc.) Iselin, N.J., of counsel., Barbara M. Epstein, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, International Trade Field Office.
Rich, Mayer, Rader.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (1)
PER CURIAM.
Sea-Land Service, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade granting the United States’ motion to sever and dismiss 73 of Sea-Land’s entries. The court held that Sea-Land did not timely commence suit challenging the United States Customs Service’s denial of its protests over the amount of duty assessed on the entries. See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 735 F.Supp. 1059 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1990). We affirm on the basis of the court’s opinion, which we adopt.
AFFIRMED.