William Thomas Bland v. V. Braddy, Rn, 923 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
William Thomas Bland v. V. Braddy, Rn, 923 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Thomas Bland
v.
V. Braddy, Rn
90-6173.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 28, 1991.
923 F.2d 847
Unpublished

923 F.2d 847
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Thomas BLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
V. BRADDY, RN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-6173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 7, 1991.
Decided Jan. 28, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-90-415-CT)

William Thomas Bland, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

William Thomas Bland appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bland v. Braddy, CA-90-415-CT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.