Transfilm Inc. v. Young Am. Films, Inc., 274 A.D. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1948). · Go Syfert
Transfilm Inc. v. Young Am. Films, Inc., 274 A.D. 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Transfilm Incorporated
v.
Young America Films, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 21, 1948.
Published opinion
274 A.D. 776
1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3276
Published

Order and interlocutory judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by appointing an official referee to take and state the account. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., concurs in memorandum as follows: I concur in the result. However I believe that plaintiff is not entitled to succeed in equity. The complaint states a cause of action at law and it being conceded that there is no triable issue, plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment as in an action at law with an assessment of damages by an official referee. Settle order on notice.