Baldwin v. Kramer, 2 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1852). · Go Syfert
Baldwin v. Kramer, 2 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1852). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. R. BALDWIN and J. H. POLLARD
v.
WILLIAM KRAMER
California Supreme Court.
Oct 15, 1852.
Published opinion
2 Cal. 582
Surd and Wallace, for plaintiffs., Thorn and Ward, for defendants.
Heydeneeldt.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Heydeneeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court; with which Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

This was an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The judgment was rendered in May, and the new trial granted at a subsequent term in September.

We hold, that after the expiration of a term of the District Court, no power remains in it to set aside a judgment, or grant a new trial. A different doctrine would lead to great uncertainty, and pojsibly to gross abuse. There must be a time when the rights of the parties are to be considered as determined, and for litigation to cease; and for this purpose the law has wisely fixed the rule here indicated.

Let the order be reversed with costs.