Newcomb v. Middle Country Cent. Sch. Dist., 62 N.E.3d 564 (N.Y. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Newcomb v. Middle Country Cent. Sch. Dist., 62 N.E.3d 564 (N.Y. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Meadow E. Assoc. LP v. Village of Potsdam (nyappdiv, 2022-12-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Meadow E. Assoc. LP v. Village of Potsdam
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
"For purposes of equal protection review, a legislative classification, such as the one at bar, that neither makes distinctions on the basis of a suspect class nor impairs a fundamental right, must be upheld if the challenged classification is rationally related to achievement of a legitimate state purpose" ( Korotun v Incorporated Vil. of Bayville , 26 AD3d 311, 313 [2d Dept 2006] [citations omitted], lv denied 7 NY3d 701 [2006]; see New York State United Teachers v State of New York , 140 AD3d 90, 97 [3d Dept 2016], appeal dismissed 28 NY3d 978 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 915 [2017]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Raymond Newcomb
v.
Middle Country Central School District
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 20, 2016.
62 N.E.3d 564
2016 WL 6112183
2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3202
Published

Motion by New York State Trial Lawyers Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.