Duryea v. Andrews, 58 Hun 607 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1890). · Go Syfert
Search
Duryea v. Andrews, 58 Hun 607 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1890). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 536 F. Supp. 829 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duryea
v.
Andrews
New York Supreme Court.
Dec 10, 1890.
Published opinion
58 Hun 607
1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3539
A. P. & W. Mann, for appellants. Edward Cromwell, for respondent.
Pratt.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
Pratt, J.

The judgment in this action must be affirmed. The only defense interposed was that of the statute of limitations, and that statute did not begin to run until the demand for the delivery of the horse in question was made on December 10, 1889. The horse having been stolen, its possession until such demand was, in contemplation of law, in the plaintiff, as he was its legal owner.