Lewis v. Chronicle Co., 61 Hun 627 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1891). · Go Syfert
Search
Lewis v. Chronicle Co., 61 Hun 627 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1891). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis
v.
Chronicle Co., Limited
New York Supreme Court.
Nov 13, 1891.
Published opinion
61 Hun 627
1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 440
Evarts, Choate & Beaman, (Treadwell Cleveland, of counsel,) for appellant. Tracy, MacFarland, Boardman & Platt, for respondent.
Brunt.
Published
Van Brunt, P. J.

It does not appear from the record presented on this appeal that the complaint was before the court below at the time of the hearing of this motion. It was therefore impossible for it to determine whether or not the defendant was entitled to a bill of particulars; and, the complaint not being before this court upon appeal, there is nothing in this record showing that any error was committed by the court below. The order should therefore be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.