Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maint., 220 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Claim of Fragale v. Armory Maint., 220 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Fragale
v.
Armory Maintenance, Workmen's Compensation Board
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 29, 1966.
Published opinion
220 N.E.2d 810
1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1102
Bernard F. Farley and Joseph M. Soviero for appellants., Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (David Belson, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polcmsky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent., Matthew J. Sherlock, Jr., for claimant-respondent.
Bebgan, Bubke, Desmond, Dismiss, Fuld, Keating, Scileppi, Upon, Voobhis, Vote.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs. (See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N. Y. 137; Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 4 A D 2d 110, mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N Y 2d 707.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.