In re the Arbitration between Vogel & Lewis, 224 N.E.2d 738 (N.Y. 1967). · Go Syfert
In re the Arbitration between Vogel & Lewis, 224 N.E.2d 738 (N.Y. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Arbitration between David Vogel, and David W. Lewis
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 5, 1967.
Published opinion
224 N.E.2d 738
1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1831
Seymour L. Morse for appellant., Leon M. Lubes for respondent.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. We neither consider nor pass upon the merits of the dispute to be arbitrated. We decide only that, when viewed against the factual background of the case, the arbitration clause contained in the agreement between the parties encompasses the controversy which has arisen and that such controversy is a proper subject for arbitration. As directed in Special Term’s order of August 16, 1965, “ the arbitration * * * shall proceed forthwith in accordance with the agreement ”.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitbl.