Gabay v. Rosenberg, 227 N.E.2d 889 (N.Y. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Gabay v. Rosenberg, 227 N.E.2d 889 (N.Y. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leda Gabay
v.
Esther Rosenberg, as of Saul Rosenberg
New York Court of Appeals.
May 18, 1967.
Published opinion
227 N.E.2d 889
1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1484
Sydney A. Fried for appellant., Max Wechsler and Albert L. Solodar for respondent.
Published

Order reversed, without costs. In our opinion, the agreed statement of facts is sufficient. Since the Appellate Division, taking a different view, has declined to consider or pass upon fact questions, the case is remitted to that court for a determination upon the merits. (CPLR 5613; see, e.g., Matter of Brenner v. Great Cove Realty Co., 6 N Y 2d 435, 444.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Soileppi and Brbitel dissent and vote to affirm.