Mulligan v. Wetchler, 287 N.E.2d 391 (N.Y. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Mulligan v. Wetchler, 287 N.E.2d 391 (N.Y. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan
v.
Bernard Wetchler, and City of New York
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 7, 1972.
Published opinion
287 N.E.2d 391
1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1156
W. Bernard Richland for motion., J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Bernard Burstein of counsel), opposed.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).