Waible v. Dosberg, 427 N.E.2d 507 (N.Y. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Waible v. Dosberg, 427 N.E.2d 507 (N.Y. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Baum v. Cnty. of Rockland, 337 F. Supp. 2d 454 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of William Waible
v.
Harry E. Dosberg, Jr.
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 3, 1981.
Published opinion
427 N.E.2d 507
1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2686
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Eugene F. Pigott for appellant., David L. McIntyre for Harry E. Dosberg, Jr., respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we would note that there was no finding of permeation. The sheets to which the appellant himself acted as the subscribing witness, containing 393 signatures, give the appellant more than the required signatures necessary to place him on the primary ballot.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Waghtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.