Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc., 434 N.E.2d 1341 (N.Y. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc., 434 N.E.2d 1341 (N.Y. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ella Freidus
v.
Todem Homes, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 23, 1982.
Published opinion
434 N.E.2d 1341
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3212
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, John M. Armentano. Samuel S. Tripp and Edward I. Penson for appellant., Jesse Rothman and Robert Kruger for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in that court’s memorandum decision. We add only that the Appellate Division did not exceed its powers when its order stated that “it is determined that Todem Homes, Inc., has the right to specific performance of the option agreement dated June 10, 1969”. Although not an order granting specific performance in the earlier action, we take this “determination” as a necessary predicate to deciding the question of ownership of the property in dispute.

[*529] Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur; Judge Meyer taking no part.

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.