Fazio v. Joy, 444 N.E.2d 990 (N.Y. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Fazio v. Joy, 444 N.E.2d 990 (N.Y. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sourian v. Scruggs-Leftwich, 126 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1987)
How cited ↗
Cited for
58 N.Y.2d at 676 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Sourian v. Scruggs-Leftwich, 126 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1987).published
    It is hornbook law that "the proper standard of review of determinations by the Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation and Development is a 'rational basis’ test [citations omitted]” (Matter of Fazio v Joy, 58 NY2d 674, 676 [19…
In the Matter of Theresa Fazio
v.
Daniel Joy, as Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Office of Rent and Housing Maintenance (Rent Control Division)
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 18, 1982.
Published opinion
444 N.E.2d 990
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3904
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Bernard Meyerson and Louis J. Russo for appellants., Julius Copeland and Harry Michelson for respondent.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 604). We emphasize that the proper standard of review of determinations by the Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation and Development is a “rational basis” test (Matter of Asen Bros. & Brook v Leventhal, 54 NY2d 839; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.