Case v. Brotherton, 31 S.E. 174 (Ga. 1898). · Go Syfert
Search
Case v. Brotherton, 31 S.E. 174 (Ga. 1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Schofield v. Fearon (gactapp, 1984-02-06) · Strongest negative: Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Taggart (gactapp, 1928-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1908 1967 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Taggart
Ga. Ct. App. · 1928 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, in this connection, Tinsley v. Rice, 105 Ga. 285, 290 ( 31 S. E. 174 ). 2.
cited Cited "see" Schofield v. Fearon
Ga. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Tinsley v. Rice, 105 Ga. 285 ( 31 SE 174 ) (1898).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Flyboy Aviation Properties, LLC
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
O.C.G.A. § 44-14-610; Baxter v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 301 Ga.App. 577, 584 , 688 S.E.2d 363 (2009) (“[o]ne who purchases the property with notice of the lis pendens [] is then bound to the outcome of the pending litigation, even though they were not otherwise a party to it”); see also Boca Petroco, Inc. v. Petroleum Realty II, LLC, 292 Ga.App. 833, 835 , 666 S.E.2d 12 (2008) (“[t]he doctrine imputed to all third parties [gives] constructive notice of the litigation and of the claims against property being asserted in the pleadings and [binds] third parties to the outcome”); see…
Case
v.
Brotherton
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 26, 1898.
31 S.E. 174
1898 Ga. LEXIS 650
W. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error. •, Payne & Payne and I. E. Shumate, contra.
Lumpkin.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Lumpkin, P. J.

When the recitals of fact contained in a bill of exceptions are so qualified by marginal notes entered thereon by the judge-that this court is unable to know with certainty what occurred at the-trial; and when, moreover, there is in the bill of exceptions no assignment of error upon any ruling or decision of the trial court, the writ of. error will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Ail the Justices concurring.