Wilcox v. City of Elberton, 33 S.E. 981 (Ga. 1899). · Go Syfert
Wilcox v. City of Elberton, 33 S.E. 981 (Ga. 1899). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Haley v. Haley (ga, 2007-06-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1915 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1915 1970 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Haley v. Haley (2×)
Ga. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Capitol Materials, Inc. v. Kellogg & Kimsey, Inc.
Ga. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Tyson v. Woodruff, 108 Ga. 368 ( 33 SE 981 ) (1899). 5 This remedy presupposes the existence of contract, for the agreement is not void but only voidable at the instance of the defrauded party.
cited Cited "see" King v. Lewis
Ga. · 1939 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tyson v. Woodruff, 108 Ga. 368 ( 33 S. E. 981 ); Prince Hall Masonic Building Association v. Howard, 36 Ga. App. 169 ( 136 S. E. 194 ); Armour Fertilizer Works v. Wynne Mercantile Co., 40 Ca.
discussed Cited "see" Hume v. Davison-Paxon Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1938 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this connection, Tyson v. Woodruff, 108 Ga. 368 ( 33 S. E. 981 ); Prince Hall Masonic Building Association v. Howard, 36 Ga. App. 169 ( 136 S. E. 194 ); Armour Fertilizer Works v. Wynne Mercantile Company, 40 Ga. App. 842 ( 151 S. E. 671 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilcox
v.
City of Elberton
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 24, 1899.
33 S.E. 981
J. N. Worley, for plaintiff. I. C. Van Duzer, for defendant.
Simmons.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
Simmons, C. J.

Under the facts disclosed by the record, the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing the injunction prayed for. It was error, however, to dismiss the petition on the interlocutory hearing for a temporary injunction, no demurrer having been filed thereto. Gullatt v. Thrasher, 42 Ga. 429. Direction is accordingly given that the case he reinstated. Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concurring.