Baird v. Bate, 39 S.E. 943 (Ga. 1901). · Go Syfert
Baird v. Bate, 39 S.E. 943 (Ga. 1901). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Baird
v.
Bate
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 7, 1901.
Published opinion
39 S.E. 943
1901 Ga. LEXIS 598
Sessions & Moss, for-plaintiffs in error., B. T. Frey and Enoch Faw, contra.
Fish.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Fish, J.

1. When on the hearing of a motion for a new trial, accompanied by a brief of evidence which had been duly filed, the judge in fact approved the brief as correct and then proceeded to decide the motion on its merits, a written endorsement upon the brief of the judge’s approval thereof will, though entered after the date of the judgment disposing of the motion, be held to relate back to that date and as being effectual thereon.

2. It not appearing that the verdict rendered was demanded by the law and the evidence, and this being the first grant of a new trial, the discretion of the the trial judge will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.