Miller v. Slade & Farish, 43 S.E. 69 (Ga. 1902). · Go Syfert
Search
Miller v. Slade & Farish, 43 S.E. 69 (Ga. 1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
Slade & Farish
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 12, 1902.
Published opinion
43 S.E. 69
1902 Ga. LEXIS 254
Simeon Blue, for plaintiff in error., J. H. Lumpkin and J. J. Dunham, contra.
Fish.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Fish, J.

It was not erroneous to sustain a demurrer to a plea alleging that the promissory note sued on had been altered without defendant’s consent, when, even if the alleged alteration was in the note and material, there was no allegation that it was made with intent to defraud. Civil Code, §3702; Burch v. Pope, 114 Ga. 334.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.