Guard v. State, 43 S.E. 413 (Ga. 1903). · Go Syfert
Guard v. State, 43 S.E. 413 (Ga. 1903). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guard
v.
State
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 9, 1903.
Published opinion
43 S.E. 413
1903 Ga. LEXIS 163
H. B. Strange, for plaintiff in error., John G. Hart, attorney-general, and B. T. Rawlings, solicitor-general, contra
Lamak.
Published
Lamak, J.

There was no complaint of the charge of the court. The evidence-objected. to was clearly admissible. The verdict was sustained by the evidence ; and the judgment of the court refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

By five Justices.