Napier Bros. v. Woodall, 45 S.E. 684 (Ga. 1903). · Go Syfert
Napier Bros. v. Woodall, 45 S.E. 684 (Ga. 1903). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McMurria v. Powell Bros. & Chason (ga, 1904-07-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McMurria v. Powell Bros. & Chason
Ga. · 1904 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napier v. Woodall, 118 Ga. 830 (2), and cit. 2.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Woodliff v. Bloodworth
Ga. · 1904 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Napier v. Woodall, 118 Ga. 830 , where the surety had signed not only the claim bond but also the forthcoming bond.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Napier Brothers
v.
Woodall
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Oct 30, 1903.
45 S.E. 684
1903 Ga. LEXIS 726
E. P. Johnston and Hardeman, Davis, Turner & Jones, for plaintiffs., Hardeman & Moore, contra..
Tubneb.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Tubneb, J.

1. Where an execution issues from a justice court for less than fifty dollars, and is levied on property worth more than fifty dollars, either party to a claim case growing out of such levy may appeal to the superior court. Acts of 1874, p. 85; Turman v. Cargill, 54 Ga. 663; Padgett v. Ford, 117 Ga. 508.

2. Where such a claim is entered, the surety on the forthcoming bond and on the damage bond in the claim case can not be the surety on the appeal bond. Under former decisions of this court, the plaintiff in such a case is entitled to have new and additional security. Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410; Eufaula Home Ins. Co. v. Plant, 36 Ga. 623; Osborne v. Hughes, 93 Ga. 445; Benson v. Shines, 107 Ga. 406; Harvely v. Daly, 112 Ga. 822.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.