Bradley v. State, 48 S.E. 904 (Ga. 1904). · Go Syfert
Bradley v. State, 48 S.E. 904 (Ga. 1904). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradley
v.
State
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 10, 1904.
Published opinion
48 S.E. 904
1904 Ga. LEXIS 63
C. D. 'McGregor and A. J. Camp, for plaintiff in error., John C. Hart, attorney-general, and W. K. Fielder, solicitor-general, contra.
Evans.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Evans, J.

1. “Though the amendment to the motion for a new trial was ‘allowed,’ it does not appear that the trial judge approved or certified its grounds as true. The assignments of error therein can not be considered.” Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202.

2. ■ The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict; it has met with the approval of the trial judge; and as no error of law is made apparent, the judgment denying a hew trial is Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.