Powell v. Wiley, 54 S.E. 732 (Ga. 1906). · Go Syfert
Search
Powell v. Wiley, 54 S.E. 732 (Ga. 1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mark a. Hansford v. George Randall Veal, 894 S.E.2d 215 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Powell
v.
Wiley
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 5, 1906.
Published opinion
54 S.E. 732
1906 Ga. LEXIS 292
E. M. & G. F. Mitchell and Sims & Hewlett, for plaintiff in error. W, T. Colquitt and B. J. Conyers, contra.
Atkinson.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
Atkinson, J.

1. Where an action was brought for damages for an alleged assault and battery, and the defendant offered a plea setting forth his acquittal in a criminal prosecution for the same alleged offense, there was no error in disallowing the plea or in refusing to admit evidence in support thereof. Tumlin v. Parrott, 82 Ga. 735; Cottingham v. Weeks, 54 Ga. 275. See also S. A. L. Ry. v. O’Quin, 124 Ga. 357.

2. The charge of the court complained of was not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The remaining assignments of error, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, will be treated as abandoned. Mayson v. State, 124 Ga. 789.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Pish, O, J,, absent. E. M. & G. F. Mitchell and Sims & Hewlett, for plaintiff in error. W, T. Colquitt and B. J. Conyers, contra.