No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giliard
v.
State
v.
State
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 15, 1909.
Published opinion
Frank L; Haralson, for plaintiff in error., John G. Hart, attorney-general, G. D. Hill, solicitor-general, and D. K. Johnston, contra.
Atkinson.
Published
Atkinson, J.
1. Under the showing made there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.
2. There being no grounds of the motion for a new trial except the general grounds and the overruling of the motion for a continuance, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.