Williamson v. Edwards, 138 Ga. 96 (1912). · Go Syfert
Search
Williamson v. Edwards, 138 Ga. 96 (1912). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Brooks, 107 S.E. 878 (Ga. 1921)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 97 cited at this page1 citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williamson
v.
Edwards
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 12, 1912.
Published opinion
138 Ga. 96
R. S. Foy and C. ~W. Foy, for plaintiff., Carson & McCutchen, for defendant.
Fish.
Published
Fish, C. J.

There was no contention that any error of law was committed upon the trial. There was evidence to authorize the verdict. Neither the alleged newly discovered evidence, nor the alleged misconduct of certain jurors, relatively to both of which there was conflicting evidence on the hearing of the motion, required the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.