No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gillespie
v.
Ewing
v.
Ewing
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 27, 1912.
Published opinion
F. A. Cantrell and Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiffs in error. O. N. Starr, contra.
Fish.
Published
Fish, C. J.
1. None of the exceptions taken to the instructions given to the jury, when considered in connection with the entire charge, required the grant of a new trial.
2. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, and the refusal of a new trial will not he disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur. F. A. Cantrell and Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiffs in error. O. N. Starr, contra.