Maneely v. Steele, 94 S.E. 227 (Ga. 1917). · Go Syfert
Maneely v. Steele, 94 S.E. 227 (Ga. 1917). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 1920 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1920 1973 2026
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maneely
v.
Steele, administrator
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 17, 1917.
Published opinion
94 S.E. 227
1917 Ga. LEXIS 211
J. A. Brahe and Lamar Hill, for plaintiff., James L. Key, for defendants.
Gilbert.
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published
Gilbert, J.

The petition in this case is not maintainable as one merely for the construction of a will; for, under section 4597 of the Code of 1910, only the representative of the estate may ask for the direction of a court. Cónstrued as a petition by a legatee for the recovery of property devised in a -will, a construction of the instrument may be invoked as a basis for such recovery. But in such case the petition must allege that the administrator has assented to the devise, or wrongfully refuses to assent. The petition does not conform to the above-stated requirements; and .therefore the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Lester v. Stephens, 113 Ga. 495 (3), 499 (39 S. E. 109).

Judgment affirmed.

All ihe^ Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.