Etheridge v. Etheridge, 99 S.E. 37 (Ga. 1919). · Go Syfert
Etheridge v. Etheridge, 99 S.E. 37 (Ga. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Etheridge
v.
Etheridge
No. 1110.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 16, 1919.
Published opinion
99 S.E. 37
1919 Ga. LEXIS 112
Eldridge Cutts, for plaintiff in error., McDonald & Bennett, contra.
Beck.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
Beck, P. J.

1. This court will not control the discretion of the trial court in allowing temporary alimony, unless it has been flagrantly abused. Civil Code, § 2979.

2. That the court required the husband (the defendant) upon cross-examination to state, in answer to a question propounded by plaintiff’s counsel, what he would take for a tract of land of which he was the owner, was not such error as will require the grant of a new trial; though the proper measure of the value was the true market value of the land in question. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.