Harris v. Cotton, 103 S.E. 89 (Ga. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. Cotton, 103 S.E. 89 (Ga. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Cotton
No. 1579.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
May 11, 1920.
Published opinion
103 S.E. 89
1920 Ga. LEXIS 95
J. J. Bull & Son, for plaintiffs., Jule Felton and R. L. Greer, for defendant.
Eisii.
Published
Eisii, C. J.

1. Even if the assignments of error in the motion for new trial, as to admitting evidence, are good in form with respect to sufficiently setting forth tfie evidence admitted over objection of the movant, they are without merit.

2. The verdict directed for the defendant in this case was demanded under the evidence, and it was not error to refuse a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.