Tatum v. Croswell, 174 S.E. 140 (Ga. 1934). · Go Syfert
Search
Tatum v. Croswell, 174 S.E. 140 (Ga. 1934). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pitts v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 203 S.E.2d 281 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973)
Treatment trajectory · 1934 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1934 1980 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
178 Ga. at 680 holders in, or related to stockholders in the insurance carrier?” This question is answered in the affirmative. Atlanta Coach Co. v. Cobb, 178 Ga. 544 (173 S.…1 citing caseopening of page *680 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • Pitts v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 203 S.E.2d 281 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).published
    Co. v. Mulkey, 146 Ga. 267 (1) ( 91 SE 106 ); Davison-Paxon Co. v. Walker, 174 Ga. 532, 533 ( 163 SE 212 ); Tatum v. Croswell, 178 Ga. 679, 680 ( 174 SE 140 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tatum
v.
Croswell
No. 9996.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Mar 14, 1934.
Published opinion
174 S.E. 140
1934 Ga. LEXIS 136
Burress & Dillard, for plaintiff., Spalding, MacDougald & Sibley, Sumter M. Kelley, and Estes Doremus, for defendant.
Bell.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published
Bell, J.

1. The Court of Appeals certified the following question: “Where, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of being struck by an automobile of the defendant, it appears that the defendant carries liability insurance, and the plaintiff by timely motion requests the trial judge to qualify the jury by purging the panel of any and all persons who are employees of, stockholders in, or related to stockholders in the defendant’s insurance carrier (which carrier is not a party to the action), is a refusal by the judge so to qualify -the jury reversible error, where the plaintiff does not affirmatively show that some of such jurors are employees of, stock[*680]holders in, or related to stockholders in the insurance carrier?” This question is answered in the affirmative. Atlanta Coach Co. v. Cobb, 178 Ga. 544 (173 S. E. ).

No. 9996. March 14, 1934. Burress & Dillard, for plaintiff. Spalding, MacDougald & Sibley, Sumter M. Kelley, and Estes Doremus, for defendant.

2. This court will not examine the evidence in the record for the purpose of determining whether an answer to the question is unnecessary to a decision of the case, on the theory that the verdict was demanded. Morgan County Bank v. Poullain, 157 Ga. 423 (121 S. E. 813, 33 A. L. R. 592).

All the Justices concur.