Jones v. Poole, 62 S.E. 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908). · Go Syfert
Jones v. Poole, 62 S.E. 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Poole
1108.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 10, 1908.
Published opinion
62 S.E. 711
1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 27
Land & Hall, for plaintiff in error. Crum & Jones, contra.
Russell.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Russell, J.

1. This case is practically identical as to its facts with that of Anderson v. Hall, 3 Ga. App. 555 (60 S. E. 294) ; and the writ of error must be dismissed. There is no exception to a final judgment in the court below. It does not appear from the record that a final judgment was rendered. Furthermore, the exceptions to the refusal of the amendment were not preserved pendente lite, nor would a different result have been reached had the trial judge allowed the amendment.

2. This court is without jurisdiction to consider a direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, unless there be at least a general exception to the final judgment. Lyndon v. Ga. Ry. & Elec. Co., 129 Ga. 361 (58 S. E. 1047).

3. When a writ of error is dismissed in this court, damages for delay are not recoverable. Writ of error dismissed.