Minter v. State, 65 S.E. 1079 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909). · Go Syfert
Search
Minter v. State, 65 S.E. 1079 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …the state may rely on an exception to the statute of limitation only if it alleges the exception in the indictment. ⚠ not in text
53 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rivera v. State (ga, 2023-10-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1912 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1912 1969 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Rivera v. State (4×)
Ga. · 2023 · confidence medium
“Where an exception is relied upon to prevent the bar of the statute of limitation, it must be alleged and proved.” 20 Id. (citing Hollingsworth v. State, 7 Ga. App. 16, 16 (1) (65 SE 1077) (1909) (punctuation omitted)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Taylor v. State
Ga. · 2019 · confidence medium
“In criminal cases, the statute of limitation runs . . . from the time of the criminal act to the time of indictment.” Hall v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 625, 626 (1) ( 216 SE2d 839 ) (1975). “[W]here an exception is relied upon to prevent the bar of the statute of limitation[ ], it must be alleged and proved.” Hollingsworth v. State, 7 Ga. App. 16, 16 ( 65 SE 1077 ) (1909).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gordon v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1992 · confidence medium
Finally, Enumerations 4 and 7 allege error in admission of the documents in State's Exhibit 1, a book containing, inter alia, copies of the checks and time cards of the employees for whom they were allegedly issued. (a) Gordon contends, relying on Hollingsworth v. State, 7 Ga. App. 16, 17 ( 65 SE 1079 ) (1909), that evidence relating to Counts 1 through 10 and 85 through 94, should not have been admitted due to the statute of limitation defense.
discussed Cited "see" Worthen v. State
Ga. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Minter v. State , 7 Ga. App. 14 , 14-15, 65 S.E. 1079 (1909) (saying that under Gosha , "we have no option other than to" hold that venue for the defendant's conviction for selling intoxicating liquor was not sufficiently proved by evidence that he sold a man whiskey after the man saw the defendant "sitting on the side of the road in Jasper county"); Wade v. State , 11 Ga. App. 411 , 413-415, 75 S.E. 494 (1912) (saying that the court was "constrained" by this Court's rulings to hold that venue in Grady County was not sufficiently proved by evidence that an assault occurred about half a mil…
discussed Cited "see" Worthen v. State
Ga. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Minter v. State, 7 Ga. App. 14, 14-15 ( 65 SE 1079 ) (1909) (saying that under Gosha, “we have no option other than to” hold that venue for the defendant’s conviction for selling intoxicating liquor was not sufficiently proved by evidence that he sold a man whiskey after the man saw the defendant “sitting on the side of the road in Jasper county”); Wade v. State, 11 Ga. App. 411, 413-415 ( 75 SE 494 ) (1912) (saying that the court was “constrained” by this Court’s rulings to hold that venue in Grady County was not sufficiently proved by evidence that an assault occurred abo…
examined Cited "see" Raoul Lynch v. State (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Ga. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollingsworth, 7 Ga. App. at 19 ; McKeehan v. State, 274 Ga. App. 14, 18 (4) ( 616 SE2d 489 ) (2005) (“The State may rely on an exception to the statute of limitation only if it alleges the exception in the indictment.”).
examined Cited "see" Lynch v. State (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Ga. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollingsworth , 7 Ga. App. at 19 , 65 S.E. 1077 ; McKeehan v. State , 274 Ga. App. 14 , 18 (4), 616 S.E.2d 489 (2005) ("The State may rely on an exception to the statute of limitation only if it alleges the exception in the indictment.").
cited Cited "see" Moss v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollingsworth, supra at 18-19 .
discussed Cited "see" Whitehead v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer v. State, 7 Ga. App. 7 (2) ( 65 SE 1079 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. State
Ga. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Solomon v. State, 304 Ga. 846 (3) ( 823 SE2d 265 ) (2019). time of the criminal act to the time of indictment.” Hall v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 625, 626 (1) ( 216 SE2d 839 ) (1975). “[W]here an exception is relied upon to prevent the bar of the statute of limitation[ ], it must be alleged and proved.” Hollingsworth v. State, 7 Ga. App. 16, 16 ( 65 SE 1077 ) (1909).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Minter
v.
State
2085.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 9, 1909.
65 S.E. 1079
1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 513
Doyle Campbell, for plaintiff in error., Greene F. J ohnson, solicitor, contra.
Russell.
Published
Russell, J.

The venue is not sufficiently proved. Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Cooper v. State, 106 Ga. 120 (32 S. E. 23). Judgment reversed.