Burruss-Manley Co. v. Lewis, 70 S.E. 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911). · Go Syfert
Search
Burruss-Manley Co. v. Lewis, 70 S.E. 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burruss-Manley Co.
v.
Lewis
2572.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 24, 1911.
Published opinion
70 S.E. 27
1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 39
M. G. Few, for plaintiff., J. S. Grant, E. B. Lambert, for defendant.
Powell.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Powell, J.

1. It is not valid ground for the dismissal of a petition for certiorari that one of the attorneys in the case wrote the answer of the magistrate, though this would he ground for exception to the answer. See Kelly v. Young, ante, 551.

2. The judge had the discretion to sustain the certiorari and grant a new trial (irrespective of whether the reason assigned be meritorious or not), as the evidence was conflicting. Judgment affirmed.