Rayfield v. State, 72 S.E. 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911). · Go Syfert
Rayfield v. State, 72 S.E. 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rayfield
v.
State
3530.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 7, 1911.
Published opinion
72 S.E. 515
1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 642
W. D. Nottingham, W. A. McClellan, for plaintiff in error., Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general, contra.
Russell.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Russell, J.

Where the undisputed evidence shows that the defendant was in possession of the stolen goods on the very night of the burglary, it is not prejudicial error requiring a new trial that the judge, in charging the jury as to the presumption raised from such possession, left out the word “recent.” The error in the charge was immaterial, and harmless as to the defendant.

2. The testimony of the accomplice was fully corroborated, and the verdict of guilty authorized. Judgment affirmed.