green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Olin Corp. v. FISONS PLC
See Cullen v. Mattaliano, 690 F.Supp. 93, 99 (D.Mass.1988), aff 'd, 953 F.2d 634 (1st Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Benet-Soto v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See Bennett v. Center-point Bank, 761 F.Supp. 908 (D.N.H.), aff'd. 953 F.2d 634 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Quiñones
In holding that the damages suffered were not damages to business or property, the court stated: We agree that “[h]ad Congress intended to create a federal treble damages remedy for cases involving bodily injury, injury to reputation, mental or emotional anguish, or the like, all of which 'will cause some financial loss, it could have enacted a statute referring to injury generally, without any restrictive language.” Id. at 847 (quoting Morrison v. Syntex Laboratories, 101 F.R.D. 743, 744 (D.D.C. 1984) (emphasis added)); see also Bennett v. Centerpoint Bank, 761 F.Supp. 908, 916 (D.N.H.), …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bennett (L. Dickinson)
v.
Centerpoint Bank
v.
Centerpoint Bank
91-1603.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Dec 31, 1991.
953 F.2d 634
Published
Bennett (L. Dickinson)
v.
Centerpoint Bank
NOS. 91-1603, 91-1604
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
Dec 31, 1991
Appeal From: D.N.H., 761 F.Supp. 908
1
AFFIRMED.