green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Degrooth v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Swanson v. Local IS Pension Plan, 779 F.Supp. 690, 695 (W.D.N.Y.) (district court converted a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment because the parties submitted affidavits regarding communications between a plan administrator and.the plaintiff), aff'd without opinion, 953 F.2d 636 (2d Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Desjardins v. Department of the Navy
See Veloz-Gertrudis v. United States, 768 F.Supp. 38, 41 (E.D.N.Y.1991), aff'd, 953 F.2d 636 (2d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abdul Majid Bala, Also Known as Sealed 2, Kantilal Patel, Also Known as Sealed 1
While to date we have not decided whether imperfect entrapment is proscribed by the guidelines as a ground for downward departure, we can find nothing in the guidelines to prohibit a district court from considering conduct by the government that does not give rise to an entrapment defense but that is nonetheless “aggressive encouragement of wrongdoing.” Garza-Juarez, 992 F.2d at 912 ; see also United States v. Giles, 768 F.Supp. 101, 103-04 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without op., 953 F.2d 636 (2d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnnie Robinson, James Robinson
See, e.g., United States v. Giles, 768 F.Supp. 101, 103 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (§ 5K2.12 p.s. departure available when government engaged in outrageous behavior), aff'd, 953 F.2d 636 (1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 949 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Joe Garza-Juarez and Esteban Garza-Juarez, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Sanchez v. United States, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 224 , 121 L.Ed.2d 161 (1992); United States v. Cheape, 889 F.2d 477, 480 (3d Cir.1989) (vacating sentence when district court ruled that jury’s rejection of coercion defense precluded downward departure under section 5K2.12); United States v. Whitetail, 956 F.2d 857, 863 (8th Cir.1992) (vacating sentence when district court ruled that jury’s rejection of battered-woman defense precluded application of section 5K2.12); see also United States v. Giles, 768 F.Supp. 101, 103 (S.D.N.Y.) (granting downward departure based on “the manner in which …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Giles
v.
Giles
91-1436.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 20, 1991.
Published
U.S.
v.
Giles
NO. 91-1436
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Dec 20, 1991
Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 768 F.Supp. 101
1
AFFIRMED.