William Washington Collins v. Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette, 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
William Washington Collins v. Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette, 953 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Washington Collins
v.
Tom Alexander Laverne Phillips Billy Jo McCurry J.D. Burnette
91-7153.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 17, 1992.
Unpublished opinion
953 F.2d 637
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5852
1992 WL 6303

953 F.2d 637

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Washington COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tom ALEXANDER; Laverne Phillips; Billy Jo McCurry; J.D.
Burnette, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7153.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.
Decided Jan. 17, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville, No. CA-91-9-A-C, Woodrow Wilson Jones, Senior District Judge.

William Washington Collins, appellant pro se.

Frank Parrott Graham, Roberts, Stevens & Cogburn, P.A., Asheville, N.C., Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

[*~637–638]1

William Washington Collins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Alexander, CA-91-9-A-C (W.D.N.C. July 8, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.