Ponder v. Grant, 85 S.E. 929 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915). · Go Syfert
Ponder v. Grant, 85 S.E. 929 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ponder
v.
Grant
6139.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 30, 1915.
Published opinion
85 S.E. 929
1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 163
A. M. Zellner, for plaintiff in error., Willingham & Willingham, contra.
Bkoyles.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Bkoyles, J.

1. The only issue in this case is one of fact, and, that having been resolved by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, their finding will not be disturbed.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is wholly without merit. The documentary evidence in question is merely cumulative in character; its subject-matter was testified to upon the trial, and, in its^ attempted introduction, the movant failed to meet the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6086.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.