Thomas J. Cuda Claudia S. Cuda v. United States, 953 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Thomas J. Cuda Claudia S. Cuda v. United States, 953 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hensley v. United States (kyed, 2023-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hensley v. United States
E.D. Ky. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See United States v. Green, 388 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir. 2004) (denying that counsel provided ineffective assistance by coercing defendant to plead guilty because “accurate information regarding the possible ramifications of proceeding to trial cannot be constructed as coercive”); see also Lunsford v. United States, 953 F.2d 644, 644 (6th Cir. 1992) (finding no prejudice for defendant claiming he was unlawfully induced by his attorney into pleading guilty “because the record clearly reflects that he received the benefit of his plea agreement”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas J. Cuda Claudia S. Cuda
v.
United States
91-1640.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 3, 1992.
953 F.2d 644
Unpublished

953 F.2d 644

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Thomas J. CUDA; Claudia S. Cuda, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-1640.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1992.

1

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and NATHANIEL R. JONES and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges

ORDER

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the district court.